September 16, 2025

“Non‑Alcoholic” but Intoxicating: Why THC Seltzers Face a 2025–2026 Class‑Action Wave

“Non‑Alcoholic” but Intoxicating: Why THC Seltzers Face a 2025–2026 Class‑Action Wave

The Legal Storm Brewing Over THC Seltzer Labeling (2025-2026)

As hemp-derived THC seltzers and cannabis beverages flood mainstream retail—showing up from liquor store fridge cases to online wellness boutiques—a new legal risk is coming into focus for beverage brands, distributors, and retailers. The intersection of “non-alcoholic” claims, variable THC potencies, and a growing patchwork of state-level compliance mandates is creating a perfect storm for THC seltzer labeling class action 2025 litigation.

What’s Sparking This Wave?

Hemp-derived intoxicating beverages, once a niche product, have become part of the cultural shift toward the “sober curious” lifestyle. But as these products compete directly with alcohol—despite being widely labeled as “non-alcoholic”—the intoxication risk they pose has triggered scrutiny from state attorneys general, regulators, and plaintiff firms seeking to protect consumers, especially youth.

2025 commentary from legal analysis and industry experts highlights three converging risk factors:

  • “Non-alcoholic” & “Sober Buzz” claims create confusion, as these products can in fact cause impairment akin to alcohol.
  • Serving size and THC potency inconsistencies create risk of accidental overconsumption.
  • Lack of standardized impairment warnings—unlike alcohol—leave consumers under-informed, and brands overexposed to litigation.

THC Seltzer SKUs: Claims & Confusion

A survey of 2025 top-selling THC seltzers (sources: Leafly, High Desert Relief, The Good Trade) reveals:

  • Many cans clearly claim “non-alcoholic,” “hangover-free,” or “sober buzz.”
  • Iconography such as glowing brains, smiling faces, or low-key party scenes often position products as social alternatives to alcohol—with taglines like "vibe without the booze" or "elevate, don’t inebriate."
  • Potency varies dramatically: many products offer 2.5–10mg delta-9 THC per 12 oz can, but multi-serve bottles and unregulated SKUs can range up to 50mg or more.
  • Some use unclear language such as “light buzz,” “chill,” or “blissful effect…” which are ripe targets for consumer deception claims as class action lawyers begin to probe.

https://highdesertrelief.org/leaflys-top-12-thc-seltzers-of-2025/https://www.thegoodtrade.com/features/thc-drinks-seltzers/

State-Level Labeling Mandates & Potency Rules

By mid-2025, over 27 states have enacted THC beverage compliance laws or pending bills requiring more explicit labeling and tighter retail controls:

  • Potency disclosures: Most states require front-of-pack labeling of THC content per serving and per container
  • Serving Size: Mandates often cap servings at 5-10mg THC per serving (e.g., Minnesota, Maryland) with a maximum-per-container cap (frequently 50mg). Multi-serve products require resealable packaging.
  • Impairment Warnings: States like Maryland and Colorado now require label language such as “This product contains THC and may cause intoxication. Do not operate a vehicle or machinery.”
  • Youth Appeal Mitigations: Bans on cartoon graphics or fruit-centric marketing; required “Keep out of reach of children”.
  • Universal Iconography: Several states mandate use of standardized cannabis or THC symbols on the front panel, sometimes with a THC-saturated “universal symbol.”
  • Retail Restrictions: Most states restrict sales to age 21+, require age verification, and are pushing to keep these products off conventional grocery shelves or confined to licensed outlets.

Source:https://www.cannabisregulations.ai/cannabis-and-hemp-regulations-compliance-ai-blog/thc-beverages-2025-multistate-scoreboard-trendshttps://atcc.maryland.gov/cannabis-information/thc-compliance-standards/https://drinkanomaly.com/blogs/news/what-you-need-to-know-about-thc-drink-laws

Why “Non-Alcoholic” Claims Are a Bullseye for Lawsuits

With alcohol alternatives, courts and regulators have previously found that reasonable consumers may be misled if products:

  • Cause impairment but are labeled as “non-intoxicating”
  • Suggest a “lite” or “safe” effect absent clear warnings
  • Obscure serving limits, encouraging overconsumption

THC seltzer labels echo the “light” and “hard” seltzer lawsuits of the past decade, but now with the added complexity of psychoactive ingredients. Already, plaintiff firms are investigating brands over inconsistencies in stated vs. actual THC content, ambiguous serving guides, and failure to warn about intoxication—even if compliant with state cannabis laws.

Federal & State Enforcement: Key Watchpoints for 2025–2026

  • Plaintiff Firms: Marijuana law-focused plaintiff firms are actively seeking class representatives for mislabeling, serving confusion, and failure to warn.
  • State AGs: Several state attorneys general (notably New York, Minnesota, Maryland) have launched inquiries into “youth friendly” THC drinks, improper market placement, and unclear labeling.
  • FDA & FTC: Although federal rules are lagging, both agencies have issued warning letters regarding unsubstantiated health or safety claims on intoxicating hemp products.
  • Insurance Industry: Insurers are clarifying exclusions and requiring stricter label vetting as precondition for product liability coverage in this fast-moving sector.

Litigation-Resilient Labeling: 2025 Compliance Takeaways

To reduce litigation risk, inside counsel and compliance teams should work toward a “belt and suspenders” approach. Based on state regulations and class action trends, a safe THC seltzer front-of-pack could include:

Mandatory Front-of-Pack Elements:

  • THC potency per serving (mg), THC per package (mg)
  • Prominent standardized impairment warning ("May Cause Intoxication - Not Safe for Driving/Operating Machinery")
  • Universal cannabis or THC symbol
  • Age restriction (“21+ Only - Not for Minors”)
  • Serving size icon (e.g., visual glass/can with mg labeled)

Never rely solely on “Non-alcoholic” or “hangover free” claims as a substitute for clear impairment warnings.

Obligatory Back-of-Pack Information:

  • Ingredients and cannabinoid profile
  • Batch/lot number and testing certification staple
  • Clear multi-serve instructions (if applicable): "One serving = 10mg THC. Do not exceed 2 servings in 24 hours."
  • Manufacturer contact and complaint line

Avoid: Vague descriptors (“sober buzz”), cartoon branding, therapeutic/medical benefit claims, or colorful graphics suggestive of children’s drinks.

For detailed examples: https://ctmlabelingsystems.com/thc-beverage-label-guidelines-cannabis-packaging-compliance-and-regulations/

Escalation Plan: Responding to a Demand Letter or Lawsuit

If your brand receives a demand letter related to THC beverage labeling:

  1. Notify your insurance carrier immediately. Delay in notice may void coverage for defense costs.
  2. Convene counsel and compliance teams. Assess label and marketing compliance with latest state and federal rules.
  3. Preserve all records. Save label artwork, testing certificates, customer complaint logs, batch records, and internal communications.
  4. Cease distribution of implicated SKU(s) if label deficiencies are probable—consider voluntary recall to limit damages.
  5. Respond within stipulated timeframes. Most states require substantive response within 15–30 days.
  6. Prepare to demonstrate compliance: Provide documentation of regulatory reviews, prior insurer notifications, and any good faith corrective actions.

Review: https://www.michaelbest.com/Newsroom/373509/Food-amp-Beverage-Regulatory-Update-ndash-June-2025

Tip: For recurring insurance renewal or during policy applications, proactively submit copies of label panels and regulatory certifications.


Conclusion: Litigation Proofing Your THC Seltzer Brand for 2025–2026

THC seltzers occupy a legal gray zone in 2025—enjoying huge market traction in “sober curious” circles but facing a clear and present wave of class action threats over “non-alcoholic” positioning, potency visibility, and warnings about potential impairment.

The strongest risk posture? Transparent, over-compliant labels—clear THC mg/serving, universal warnings, and serving size icons—combined with retailer training and prompt insurer engagement.

Stay ahead of the evolving multi-state patchwork and avoid class action headlines: Rely on CannabisRegulations.ai for real-time compliance intelligence, label audits, and risk management in the cannabis beverage market.


Looking for state-compliant THC beverage label templates or direct guidance? Get in touch with the team at CannabisRegulations.ai for tailored support.