TSCA PFAS Reporting Delayed to 2026: What Cannabis and Hemp Brands Should Inventory Now

TSCA PFAS Reporting for Hemp Packaging: Deadline Delayed, Compliance Imperative for Cannabis & Hemp Brands

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially postponed the TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS reporting window, offering extended time, but not relief from strict compliance, for all companies—including those in the cannabis and hemp sectors—that manufacture or import finished goods or raw materials potentially containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The most recent change impacts hemp and cannabis packaging supply chains across the U.S., amplifying the urgency for systematic PFAS inventory and data governance now.

Key Regulatory Changes in 2025

• Reporting start date: April 13, 2026
• End date: October 13, 2026
• Alternate deadline (small businesses, article importers only): April 13, 2027
• Covered period: PFAS manufactured or imported in any year since January 1, 2011
• Scope: Includes PFAS in raw materials, finished packaging (liners, closures, coatings), labels, and imported articles—not just bulk chemicals
• Possible future policy tweaks: EPA has indicated ongoing discussion about further burden relief for small businesses and imported articles, but no substantive exemptions are currently finalized (EPA Source, Federal Register)

Why Hemp and Cannabis Brands Must Prepare Now

PFAS reporting under TSCA Section 8(a)(7) is unprecedented in its sweep: all supply chain actors, including those who merely import or private-label goods, must account for even trace PFAS present in articles or packaging. For cannabis and hemp product brands, this means:

• Packaging materials (flexible pouches, rigid plastics, liners, foils, closures, tamper-evident seals)
• Labels (adhesives, coatings, inks)
• Processing and production equipment (gaskets, tubing, non-stick surfaces)
• Imported packaged products (pre-filled vape cartridges, edible pouches, pre-roll cones, etc.)

If not addressed, regulatory lag or error exposes brands to enforcement, product interruptions, and reputational risk—especially as states advance their own PFAS bans for packaging and stricter drinking water limits (read more).

The TSCA Section 8(a)(7) PFAS Reporting Rule: What’s Required?

Applicability and Coverage

• Applies to: Manufacturers, importers, and processors of PFAS or PFAS-containing articles, including those sourcing finished goods (not just chemical producers).
• Reporting period: Any activity (manufacture/import) from 2011 through 2022.

What Information Must Be Reported?

• Identity and amount of each PFAS manufactured/imported
• Categories of use (packaging, equipment, textiles, etc.)
• Production volumes by year
• Exposures and end usages
• Disposal and environmental release data, if available

See full reporting instructions via the EPA

Special Provisions for Article Importers & Small Businesses

• Small businesses only importing articles have until April 13, 2027.
• There are currently NO blanket exemptions for packaging or articles—every business along the chain must assess its own PFAS status (Beveridge & Diamond).

Cannabis & Hemp Packaging: Where Are the PFAS Risks?

Key Areas of Exposure

1. Primary packaging: Pouches, bottles, jars, tubes (liners, coatings, adhesives, films)
2. Closures and seals: Tamper bands, caps, foils
3. Labels and inks: Water-resistant labels and adhesives
4. Shipping cartons: Paper and molded fiber may contain PFAS-based sizing agents
5. Equipment: Food contact gaskets, nonstick conveyor belts, tubing
6. Imports: Pre-assembled components (e.g., vape cartridges, wrappers) with unclear PFAS disclosure

Why Do These Materials Contain PFAS?

PFAS are prized for their grease, moisture, and chemical resistance. Legacy packaging, certain imported goods, and high-performing barrier materials are most likely to contain them. Even biodegradable or “eco-friendly” offerings may be affected unless supplier data proves otherwise.

Building a PFAS Inventory: Action Steps for Brands

1. Supply Chain Mapping

• Compile complete inventories of all packaging, labeling, and processing equipment used since 2011 (required reporting window).
• Identify each supplier, tier, and country of origin.

2. Supplier Attestations and Declarations

• Request signed statements or certificates from suppliers confirming the presence/absence of PFAS in their products.
• Use standard language developed for state PFAS bans or [CannabisRegulations.ai] templates to ensure consistency.
• Flag all suppliers who cannot or will not comply as possible risk points.

3. Review Certificates of Analysis (COAs) and Safety Data Sheets (SDSs)

• Many chemical or raw material suppliers already update product datasheets to declare PFAS-free status—obtain and archive up-to-date records.
• For legacy materials (2011–present), document reasonable best-efforts to identify PFAS.

4. Data Governance and Recordkeeping

• Set up centralized digital record systems for retaining supply chain disclosures, COAs, and completed compliance checklists.
• Prepare for automated or digital submission to EPA platforms—manual record-keeping is discouraged.

5. Gap Analysis and Legal Review

• Conduct a gap analysis to find unknowns or duplication in the supply chain.
• Engage compliance tech or regulatory consultants (not legal advice) to confirm all systems are robust.

Intersection With State PFAS Packaging Bans and Drinking Water Rules

Many states now prohibit or strictly limit PFAS in food-contact packaging, with penalties for violations regardless of federal TSCA compliance. For cannabis and hemp brands, the regulatory map is even more complex, as the state and federal definitions, acceptable detection limits, and enforcement vary widely. The upcoming federal reporting will be reviewed alongside existing state mandates, reinforcing the need for airtight documentation.

Tip: A robust PFAS inventory for federal reporting will also streamline compliance with state bans by providing the same supply chain transparency, reducing audit and enforcement disruption.

Timeline: What to Do, and When

• 2024–Q1 2026: Begin inventory, supplier outreach, and gap analysis
• Q2 2026: Confirm and digitize PFAS inventory; implement data governance protocols
• April 13–October 13, 2026: Report to EPA under TSCA Section 8(a)(7)
• By April 13, 2027: Small business article importers submit final reports

Failing to meet these deadlines could mean penalties, product holds, or recalls.

Enforcement and Risks: What Happens If You Don’t Prepare?

EPA and state agencies are aggressively pursuing PFAS noncompliance, increasingly through audits and product sampling. Failure to report accurately on PFAS content in packaging or imported articles—whether due to supplier nondisclosure, incomplete records, or missed deadlines—can trigger fines, import holds, or even reputational damage from marketplace listing removals.

• EPA penalties for TSCA violations: Can exceed $50,000 per day per violation
• State enforcement: Potential separate action for noncompliant packaging, even if federal reporting is complete

Clear Takeaways and Next Steps for Compliance

1. Start PFAS inventory mapping now—the 2026 window will close fast, and documenting back to 2011 is a significant lift.
2. Secure supplier attestations for all packaging and imported goods by Q1 2026; chase up laggards.
3. Digitize your records—EPA will favor quick, auditable submissions.
4. Leverage comprehensive checklists and supplier questionnaire templates—see those here at CannabisRegulations.ai.
5. Monitor state law changes—federal reporting does not exempt you from more stringent state PFAS bans for packaging.

For ongoing guidance, templates, and smart compliance tech for TSCA PFAS reporting and cannabis/hemp packaging rules, trust CannabisRegulations.ai. Our tools and updates ensure you stay ahead of evolving regulations while protecting your brand and consumers.